« Gladwell on late-bloomers and prodigies in art | Main | Disease mongering for fun and profit »

April 11, 2006

The freakonomic take on bird flu:

Freakonomics.jpgSteven Levitt, the economist, and Stephen Dubner, the journalist – authors of Freakonomicsappeared on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme yesterday.

The pair are (in)famous for their alternative explanations of historical phenomena, based on their application of economic tools of analysis to social patterns. For example, they’ve argued that the 50 per cent fall in crime in the USA in the last 15 years was caused by the legalisation of abortion in the 1970’s. Unwanted children are known to be at increased risk of becoming criminals, and so the reduction in the number of unwanted kids has meant less crime (so the logic goes).

In this interview they suggest that, so long as it doesn’t spread to humans, the threat of bird flu here in the UK may paradoxically lead to health benefits as a result of millions of anxious people washing their hands more often.

christian.

Posted at April 11, 2006 12:24 PM

Comments

Blar says:

For the record, the Levitt argument is that about a quarter to a third of the 50 percent drop in crime was due to legalized abortion, while most of the rest was caused by hiring more police officers, increased incarceration, and the end of the crack epidemic. Dubner makes that clear url I provided.

Comment posted at April 12, 2006 02:22 AM

christian says:

Thanks for clarifying that - I don't think it was clear from the radio interview.

Comment posted at April 12, 2006 09:21 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?