« Cognitive neuroscience of rock! | Main | Mental health first aid »

August 24, 2006

Pamela Anderson and the hindu goddesses:

statue_ankor.jpgThere's a curious letter in today's New Scientist that takes issue with a recent criticism of V.S. Ramachandran's theory of the neuroscience of art.

The criticism attacks Ramachandran's theory on the basis that it fails to distinguish between images of big-breasted women such as Hindu statues of goddesses and actual big-breasted women such as Pamela Anderson.

In contrast, the letter to New Scientist says that the comparison is fair because Anderson's image "is deliberately created using the specific techniques of plastic surgery, diet, exercise, make-up, clothing and photography".

Hopefully, the world of neuroaesthetics will now be at peace over this particular issue.


Link to letter in New Scientist.

Vaughan.

Posted at August 24, 2006 08:00 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?